Ross Taylor

Sisyphus and me (subtitle – bridge hell)

It didn’t matter how many times I played this maddening hand yesterday – I was always going down – the layout of the opponents’ cards eluding me with each line of play I tried.

In each case the auction was the same. My WEST opened the bidding 3 clubs, which was passed around to me. I held AK9   QJ7xx  853  73, and we were red vs white. Each time I braved a 3 heart bid – which was rewarded with a gentle 4 heart response from Keith, holding an opening bid of his own including AK9x of hearts. There’s a nice partner !

 

Dealer: West

Vul: NS

North  
108xx
AK9x
A9
Q9x
     
       
       
       
       
  South  
AK9
QJ7xx
853
73

 

The opening lead was the seven of diamonds. I played dummy’s Ace. EAST playing the deuce – highly encouraging.

Attempt #1

I played a trump to the queen and a trump back to dummy’s Ace. EAST pitched a discouraging spade (clearly from length)

I decided my best bet to make ten tricks was to build the queen of clubs as a trick. So, needing two dummy entries, I left the trumps alone and played a low club from the dummy. EAST won the king (good !) and cashed the king of diamonds and gave her partner a spade ruff. Down 1. WEST had been 0-3-3-7. 

The winning line was simply to draw trumps and double hook the spades.

Attempt #2

Again I played a trump to the queen and a trump back to dummy’s Ace. EAST pitched a discouraging spade (clearly from length)

This time I decided my best bet was both the queen and the jack of spades onside. I immediately drew the last trump with dummy’s king and led a spade to the nine. It lost to the queen, and now there was no more time or entries to establish the club queen for trick 10. WEST was 1-3-2-7.

The winning line here was to set up the club queen in dummy, and to do so before drawing West’s last trump, while I had an extra trump entry to dummy.

Attempt #3

Again I played a trump to the queen and a trump back to dummy’s Ace. EAST pitched a discouraging spade (clearly from length)

This time I really wasn’t sure which black suit I should count on for the tenth trick. Was there a way to avoid a guess? I decided to hedge my bets. I reasoned as long as WEST had at least one spade (likely an honor from his failure to lead one) I could defer the decision, depending on the apparent count in the diamond suit.

I abandoned trumps, and led dummy’s last diamond. I figured if WEST played up the line in diamonds, then clubs were not likely to come home (his shape must be 1-3-3-6). In that case, I would bank on split spade honours. That is, I would win the first spade trick with a high honour, dropping the presumed honour on my left. (This seemed more likely than a stiff small spade since he had not led one at trick one)

I was not too worried about a spade ruff as there was no such table vibe, including no unnaturally low club lead at trick one fishing for a spade shift.

WEST played up the line on the second round of diamonds. EAST tapped the dummy with another diamond. I ruffed, and played a spade to my Ace. There was no timber falling from West though. He had begun with 1-3-3-6 shape and had elected to lead a diamond from Q10x as his surprise attack. I ended up down 1. Here, the winning line was a double spade finesse.

Attempt #4

Again I played a trump to the queen and a trump back to dummy’s Ace. EAST pitched a discouraging spade (clearly from length)

Again, I abandoned trumps, preserving entries, and led dummy’s last diamond. When West high – lowed in diamonds, he rated to be 1-3-2-7. I would know what to do depending on East’s next move.

But West high lowed in diamonds because he began with four diamonds, not two !

Which meant he had a spade void, and his grateful partner found that shift pretty damn quickly.

Modern preempts ! – who needs a 7 card suit when a 6-4 shape is eminently suitable?

The layout was something like

 

Dealer: West

Vul: NS

North  
108xx
AK9x
A9
Q9x
West East
void QJ7xxx
10xx x
Q10xx KJxx
A10xxxx KJ
  South  
AK9
QJ7xx
853
73

 

 

At the other table, our opponents conservatively stopped in 2 hearts (clearly no 3 club opener from my team mate). Had I made 4 hearts, we would have won 10 imps – a 17 imp swing.

Sisyphus had no choice. No matter how many times he pushed the boulder to the top of the mountain, it always rolled back to the bottom. His personal hell being he was doomed to do this for eternity.

Bill Murray was doomed to relive the same day over and over again until he found true love in the movie Groundhog Day.

I gave up this hand after only four attempts. Masochism only runs so deep in my genes.

Should you build up the club queen? Should you take a double hook in spades? Should you drop a spade honor offside and then finesse for the other. In bridge hell, you never get these decisions right.


11 Comments

Dave Memphis MOJODecember 28th, 2009 at 9:39 pm

I like the first line of play best

Wayne TimmsDecember 29th, 2009 at 4:30 am

It is Xmas, and I was given a pony for Xmas, so with Mr Balcombe’s hand I bid 3 no-trump (it’s a 9 trick pony by the way). Considering all of my hand, its unfathomable that my partner does not have a spade card. But even more important it keeps my partner off play and leaves me with only a 1 choice play in the hand, and almost as important, even God doesn’t ruff in no-trump!! 🙂

Chris HasneyDecember 29th, 2009 at 5:10 am

Lol, Hamman’s rule would have worked. When I tried it last week I was down 3 with no chance.

There’s a really cute story about the guy who dies and goes to bridge court to play an (almost) impossible hand for all the marbles. Anyone remember it?

LaurelleDecember 17th, 2015 at 4:38 am

I don’t think Curt would have much of a shot winning any eltoeicn. Is there anyone out there who actually likes him? For all he did for Boston, still every Boston fan I know doesn’t really like him, they just respond to questions with something like, well, I’m really happy for what he helped accomplish for us, but he should shut his mouth because he’s an idiot.As for Moose in Hall, I guess it makes sense that he not get in if we look at his peers who will be getting nominated around the same time- Maddux, Smoltz, Glavine, Randy Johnson, Clemens, Pedro. Those are all guys who were incredibly dominant. Moose, as great as he was, just wasn’t in that league. While I have never thought much of Glavine, he does have the magic number and that’s what counts to get him over the hump. As far as Moose playing on the Orioles in the 90s and Yankees in the 2000s, that’s true that that probably helped him get some wins, but it’s also true that pitching in the AL East probably took away it’s fair share of wins from him. Facing at various times the Sox, Yankees, Orioles, and Blue Jays is not an easy task- far more difficult than playing in other divisions. This is the premier offense division and probably always will be.Side note: if Moose shouldn’t get in before Blyleven- should Schilling get in before him? Or before Jack Morris for that matter? Schilling’s got the 3000+ strikeouts, but he doesn’t have the win total of Moose or Blyleven (who also has more Ks, as do Clemens, the Unit, Maddux, and Pedro). He also has the postseason record, making him similar to Morris. If you put those together does it make him Hall worthy? I don’t know. I think right now people think he and Moose should get in, but in five years from now, with some perspective, I think people will answer no.’

http://www.ionicbathfootdetox.com/April 29th, 2016 at 12:33 am

Scrivi il tuo commento Puoi usare questi tags HTML : <a> <abbr> <acronym> <b> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <del> <em> <i> <q> <strike> <strong> var RecaptchaOptions = { theme : ‘red’, lang : ‘en’ , tabindex : 5 };   #submit {display:none;}

http://www.sorethumbsblog.com/April 29th, 2016 at 12:42 am

tego mÄ…drzejszy.. NastÄ™pnym razem idź w jakość a nie w ilość.. UzasadniÄ™ za dwie godziny ale już teraz napiszÄ™, ze trzeba mieć niezÅ‚Ä… fantazjÄ™ by wykombinować sobie, ze polscy rekonstruktorzy ot tak, dla rozrywki postanowili obić gÄ™bÄ™ Niemcowi tylko dlatego, ze im siÄ™ nie podobaÅ‚… Naprawde wierzysz w to co napisaÅ‚esÅ› Pandada?

http://www.blrimages.net/April 29th, 2016 at 1:11 am

You see, people will always question what they don’t understand.  And what perplexes people more than anything else is when you would possibly want to make a change in your life, when it’s so much WORK.  That dreaded “W” word.Â

http://www.ionicbathfootdetox.com/April 29th, 2016 at 1:15 am

I genuinely enjoy examining on this web site, it holds excellent blog posts. “Don’t put too fine a point to your wit for fear it should get blunted.” by Miguel de Cervantes.

http://www.automaticleadtoolsreview.us/July 6th, 2016 at 8:49 pm

Wow! This can be one particular of the most helpful blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Actually Excellent. I am also a specialist in this topic so I can understand your effort.

kostenlose kreditkarteOctober 19th, 2016 at 3:57 pm

– FDB, you’ve left out another possibility – viz. an active choice to wear a hijab or burqa despite parents who are indifferent, or even hostile. She’s spot on that there’s a lot of evidence that second generation folks in Western countries are more concerned with asserting a religious identity than a national/ethnic one.

http://www./November 4th, 2016 at 6:22 am

et le problème du tableau proposé est qu’il faudrait une ligne intitulée « intelligence », avec un coeff bien supérieur à toutes les autres, ce qui est un peu délicat à remplir. mieux vaut je trouve répartir en s’attachant à l’énergie fournie.

Leave a comment

Your comment